View In:
ArcGIS JavaScript
ArcGIS Online Map Viewer
ArcGIS Earth
ArcMap
ArcGIS Pro
View Footprint In:
ArcGIS Online Map Viewer
Service Description: Impervious surfaces for the State of New Jersey. Three classes of impervious surfaces were mapped: 1) Buildings, Roads, and Other Impervious Surfaces. Note that buildings do not exist for some areas due to the lack of LiDAR data. In these instances, buildings are assigned to the Other Impervious class. The overall accuracy of the mapping was 94%. The user's accuracies for Buildings, Roads, and Other Paved were 94%, 87%, and 84% respectively.The 2015 leaf-off New Jersey orthorectified imagery served as the primary data source, but the 1-meter leaf-on imagery acquired through the National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) in the summer of 2015 was also used. Several additional datasets, that although dated and flawed, that still had value were used to supplement the process. This includes LiDAR data, which was collected at varying time periods in New Jersey, road centerlines, and the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). Initial feature extraction was carried out in the coordinate system of the LiDAR data (most often UTM). LiDAR point clouds were normalized and classified to separate out buildings and trees. Raster surface models and intensity images were generated from the LiDAR point cloud data. Imagery data were mosaicked, and vector datasets were examined for completeness, accuracy, and topology.This project employed a semi-automated approach in which features were automatically extracted then manually reviewed and edited. The automated feature extraction workflow used an OBIA framework to automatically extract aforementioned impervious classes from the source datasets using a rule-based expert system. The expert system made use of segmentation, classification, and morphology algorithms to group pixels into objects, classify the objects based on the properties of the source datasets, and then refined the objects to enhance aesthetics and improve visual realism. The approach to mapping involved both automated feature extraction techniques and manual editing of impervious surfaces. A “bottom-up” approach to mapping was carried out in which impervious surface features that are under tree canopy but visible in the leaf-off imagery was mapped. The key advantage of the object-based approach is that the use of the spectral, textural, geometric, and contextual properties in the imagery reduce confusion between impervious land cover features and those that are similar in tone, such sand on the banks of streams.
Map Name: Rast_impervious_surface_3857
Legend
All Layers and Tables
Dynamic Legend
Dynamic All Layers
Layers:
Description: Impervious surfaces for the State of New Jersey. Three classes of impervious surfaces were mapped: 1) Buildings, Roads, and Other Impervious Surfaces. Note that buildings do not exist for some areas due to the lack of LiDAR data. In these instances, buildings are assigned to the Other Impervious class. The overall accuracy of the mapping was 94%. The user's accuracies for Buildings, Roads, and Other Paved were 94%, 87%, and 84% respectively.The 2015 leaf-off New Jersey orthorectified imagery served as the primary data source, but the 1-meter leaf-on imagery acquired through the National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) in the summer of 2015 was also used. Several additional datasets, that although dated and flawed, that still had value were used to supplement the process. This includes LiDAR data, which was collected at varying time periods in New Jersey, road centerlines, and the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). Initial feature extraction was carried out in the coordinate system of the LiDAR data (most often UTM). LiDAR point clouds were normalized and classified to separate out buildings and trees. Raster surface models and intensity images were generated from the LiDAR point cloud data. Imagery data were mosaicked, and vector datasets were examined for completeness, accuracy, and topology.This project employed a semi-automated approach in which features were automatically extracted then manually reviewed and edited. The automated feature extraction workflow used an OBIA framework to automatically extract aforementioned impervious classes from the source datasets using a rule-based expert system. The expert system made use of segmentation, classification, and morphology algorithms to group pixels into objects, classify the objects based on the properties of the source datasets, and then refined the objects to enhance aesthetics and improve visual realism. The approach to mapping involved both automated feature extraction techniques and manual editing of impervious surfaces. A “bottom-up” approach to mapping was carried out in which impervious surface features that are under tree canopy but visible in the leaf-off imagery was mapped. The key advantage of the object-based approach is that the use of the spectral, textural, geometric, and contextual properties in the imagery reduce confusion between impervious land cover features and those that are similar in tone, such sand on the banks of streams.
Copyright Text: NJDEP
Spatial Reference:
102100
(3857)
Single Fused Map Cache: true
Tile Info:
- Height: 256
- Width: 256
- DPI: 96
-
Levels of Detail: 24
-
Level ID: 1
[ Start Tile, End Tile ]
- Resolution: 78271.5169639999
- Scale: 2.95828763795777E8
-
Level ID: 2
[ Start Tile, End Tile ]
- Resolution: 39135.7584820001
- Scale: 1.47914381897889E8
-
Level ID: 3
[ Start Tile, End Tile ]
- Resolution: 19567.8792409999
- Scale: 7.3957190948944E7
-
Level ID: 4
[ Start Tile, End Tile ]
- Resolution: 9783.93962049996
- Scale: 3.6978595474472E7
-
Level ID: 5
[ Start Tile, End Tile ]
- Resolution: 4891.96981024998
- Scale: 1.8489297737236E7
- Format: MIXED
- Compression Quality: 75.0
- Origin: X: -2.0037508342787E7
Y: 2.0037508342787E7
- Spatial Reference: 102100
(3857)
Storage Info:
- Storage Format: esriMapCacheStorageModeCompactV2
- Packet Size: 128
Initial Extent:
XMin: -8539223.557554401
YMin: 4662956.629725
XMax: -8099007.3419456035
YMax: 5113633.428674998
Spatial Reference: 102100
Full Extent:
XMin: -8411249.903
YMin: 4711605.126999997
XMax: -8226980.9965
YMax: 5064984.931400001
Spatial Reference: 102100
Units: esriMeters
Supported Image Format Types: PNG32,PNG24,PNG,JPG,DIB,TIFF,EMF,PS,PDF,GIF,SVG,SVGZ,BMP
Document Info:
Title: Untitled.aprx
Author:
Comments: Impervious surfaces for the State of New Jersey. Three classes of impervious surfaces were mapped: 1) Buildings, Roads, and Other Impervious Surfaces. Note that buildings do not exist for some areas due to the lack of LiDAR data. In these instances, buildings are assigned to the Other Impervious class. The overall accuracy of the mapping was 94%. The user's accuracies for Buildings, Roads, and Other Paved were 94%, 87%, and 84% respectively.The 2015 leaf-off New Jersey orthorectified imagery served as the primary data source, but the 1-meter leaf-on imagery acquired through the National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) in the summer of 2015 was also used. Several additional datasets, that although dated and flawed, that still had value were used to supplement the process. This includes LiDAR data, which was collected at varying time periods in New Jersey, road centerlines, and the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). Initial feature extraction was carried out in the coordinate system of the LiDAR data (most often UTM). LiDAR point clouds were normalized and classified to separate out buildings and trees. Raster surface models and intensity images were generated from the LiDAR point cloud data. Imagery data were mosaicked, and vector datasets were examined for completeness, accuracy, and topology.This project employed a semi-automated approach in which features were automatically extracted then manually reviewed and edited. The automated feature extraction workflow used an OBIA framework to automatically extract aforementioned impervious classes from the source datasets using a rule-based expert system. The expert system made use of segmentation, classification, and morphology algorithms to group pixels into objects, classify the objects based on the properties of the source datasets, and then refined the objects to enhance aesthetics and improve visual realism. The approach to mapping involved both automated feature extraction techniques and manual editing of impervious surfaces. A “bottom-up” approach to mapping was carried out in which impervious surface features that are under tree canopy but visible in the leaf-off imagery was mapped. The key advantage of the object-based approach is that the use of the spectral, textural, geometric, and contextual properties in the imagery reduce confusion between impervious land cover features and those that are similar in tone, such sand on the banks of streams.
Subject: Impervious surfaces for the State of New Jersey. Three classes of impervious surfaces were mapped: 1) Buildings, Roads, and Other Impervious Surfaces. Note that buildings do not exist for some areas due to the lack of LiDAR data.
Category:
Keywords: Impervious surface,buildings,roads,njdep
AntialiasingMode: None
TextAntialiasingMode: Force
Supports Dynamic Layers: true
MaxRecordCount: 2000
MaxImageHeight: 4096
MaxImageWidth: 4096
Supported Query Formats: JSON, geoJSON, PBF
Supports Query Data Elements: true
Min Scale: 2311162.217155
Max Scale: 72223.819286
Supports Datum Transformation: true
Child Resources:
Info
Dynamic Layer
Supported Operations:
Export Map
Identify
QueryLegends
QueryDomains
Find
Return Updates